AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
In May 2015, Senator Brian Schatz (D–Hawaii) sent a letter to President Obama recommending Endo for a posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom, the same honor that had already been awarded to Fred Korematsu in 1998 and posthumously to Gordon Hirabayashi in 2012. Mitsuye Endo's postwar lifeĪfter the war, Endo would eventually settle in Chicago, Illinois, where she died of cancer on April 14, 2006. 21 the day before the Endo and Korematsu rulings were made public, on December 17, 1944, rescinding the exclusion orders and declaring that Japanese Americans could begin returning to the West Coast in January 1945. The Roosevelt administration, having been alerted to the Court's decision, issued Public Proclamation No. In short, while Endo determined that a citizen could not be imprisoned if the government was unable to prove she was disloyal, Korematsu allowed the government a loophole to criminally punish that citizen for refusing to be illegally imprisoned. As Justice Roberts pointed out in his Korematsu dissent, distinguishing the cases required a reliance on the legal fiction that Korematsu only dealt with the exclusion of Japanese Americans, not their detention-that Fred Korematsu could have gone anywhere else in the United States, when in reality he would have been subject to the detainment found illegal in Endo. e conclude that, whatever power the War Relocation Authority may have to detail other classes of citizens, it has no authority to subject citizens who are concededly loyal to its leave procedure."īecause of this avoidance, it is very difficult to reconcile Endo with Korematsu, which was decided the same day. It stopped short of addressing the question of the government's right to exclude citizens based on military necessity, instead focusing on the actions of the WRA: "In reaching that conclusion we do not come to the underlying constitutional issues which have been argued. Douglas, with Justices Frank Murphy and Owen Roberts concurring. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. The unanimous opinion ruling in Endo's favor was written by Justice William O. Endo, Korematsu, and the end of internment The War Relocation Authority had offered to release her from camp (provided she agreed not to return to the West Coast) in an effort to halt the case, but Endo refused and so remained in confinement. By this time Endo had been transferred to Topaz, Utah-Tule Lake having been converted to a segregated detention center for "disloyal" Japanese American inmates. An appeal was perfected to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in August 1943, and in April 1944 Judge William Denman sent the case to the Supreme Court rather than issuing a ruling himself. Roche heard Endo's case in July 1942 but did not issue a ruling until July 1943, when he denied her petition without explanation. On July 13, 1942, Purcell filed the habeas corpus petition for Endo's release from the Tule Lake concentration camp where she and her family were being held. Endo was selected as a test case to file a writ of habeas corpus because of her profile as an Americanized, "assimilated" Nisei: a practicing Christian who had never been to Japan, spoke only English and no Japanese, and had a brother in the U.S. ![]() ![]() Civil rights attorney and then-president of the Japanese American Citizens League Saburo Kido, with San Francisco attorney James Purcell, began a legal campaign to assist these workers, but the mass removal authorized by Executive Order 9066 in early 1942 complicated their case. After the attack on Pearl Harbor soured public sentiment toward Japanese Americans, Endo and other Nisei state employees were harassed and eventually fired because of their Japanese ancestry. In reaching that conclusion, we do not come to the underlying constitutional issues which have been argued.Mitsuye Endo, the plaintiff in the case, had worked as a clerk for the California Department of Motor Vehicles in Sacramento prior to the war. Her petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleges that she is a loyal and law-abiding citizen of the United States, that no charge has been made against her, that she is being unlawfully detained, and that she is confined in the Relocation Center under armed guard and held there against her will…įirst. We are of the view that Mitsuye Endo should be given her liberty. On February 19, 1942, the President promulgated Executive Order No. It need be only briefly recapitulated here. The history of the evacuation of Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese ancestry from the Pacific coastal regions, following the Japanese attack on our Naval Base at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and the declaration of war against Japan on December 8, 1941, 55 Stat. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court…
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |